SHREEJANA SHRESTHA
The High-Level Political Mechanism (HLPM) is yet to take a complete shape, though it has almost been a month since its formation. There is still a debate going on in the political circle regarding the relevance and effectiveness of the high-level body. Political parties are demanding that the body should be more inclusive.
The HLPM was formed on Jan 8 following months of negotiations among the top three parties Unified CPN (Maoist), Nepali Congress (NC) and CPN-UML. The HLPM formed under the chairmanship of former Prime Minister (PM) Girija Prasad Koirala has chairman of Unified CPN (Maoist) Pushpa Kamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’ and UML chairman Jhala Nath Khanal as members.
At the time of formation of HLPM, the members in the high-level body tried to win the confidence of the general public saying that it will take the peace process to a logical end and help in drafting the new constitution within the stipulated time. The primary task entrusted to HLPM was to forge a consensus among the top political parties that have sharp differences on key issues.
The body has held its meeting a number of times but without much achievement. The only achievement made by the mechanism has been to convince the Maoists to withdraw their indefinite strike that was supposed to begin on Jan 24. The third meeting of HLPM endorsed its Terms of Reference (ToR) and working procedures. But the parties need to understand that passing the ToR just to include representatives from more political parties is not sufficient. They need to make the mechanism capable of resolving the current political stalemate.
